Flask vs
Next.js

An honest, data-driven comparison for 2026

This isn't about bashing Next.js. It's about choosing the right tool.

Next.js is incredible for certain use cases. But for most web applications—CRUD apps, dashboards, internal tools, MVPs—Flask is faster, simpler, and more transparent.

Below is a comprehensive comparison based on real projects, not marketing claims.

Project Structure

Same app, different complexity

Flask Project ~15 files
myapp/ ├── app.py # Main app (100 lines) ├── requirements.txt # 3-5 dependencies ├── .env # Environment vars ├── templates/ │ ├── base.html │ ├── home.html │ ├── login.html │ └── dashboard.html ├── static/ │ ├── css/ │ │ └── style.css │ ├── js/ │ │ └── main.js # Vanilla JS │ └── images/ └── migrations/ # SQL files └── 001_init.sql Total: 15-20 files you actually touch No node_modules. No build cache. No config hell.
Next.js Project ~50+ files
myapp/ ├── package.json # 50+ dependencies ├── next.config.js ├── tsconfig.json ├── .eslintrc ├── tailwind.config.js ├── postcss.config.js ├── app/ │ ├── layout.tsx │ ├── page.tsx │ ├── api/ │ │ ├── users/ │ │ │ └── route.ts │ │ └── auth/ │ │ └── route.ts │ ├── dashboard/ │ │ ├── page.tsx │ │ └── layout.tsx │ └── login/ ├── components/ # React components ├── lib/ # Prisma, utils ├── types/ # TypeScript types ├── prisma/ │ └── schema.prisma ├── node_modules/ # 300MB, 30,000 files └── .next/ # Build cache, 100MB+ Total: 50-100+ files you manage Plus 30,000 dependency files. Plus build artifacts.

The Difference

Flask: 15 files you understand completely. Next.js: 50+ files you wrote, plus 30,000 files in node_modules you've never seen. Which one can you debug at 2am?

Performance Metrics

Measured from dedicated benchmark applications — same SaaS dashboard, both stacks

Largest Contentful Paint

905ms

Flask

1.66s

Next.js

JS Bundle

0 KB

Flask

95 KB

Next.js (split)

Time to Interactive

905ms

Flask (no hydration)

1.66s

Next.js (hydration cost)

Lighthouse Score

100

Flask

100

Next.js — tie

Build Time

0s

Flask (no build)

2m

Next.js

Install Time

10s

Flask (pip)

5m

Next.js (npm)

Disk Space

5MB

Flask

300MB

Next.js (node_modules)

Learning Curve

1 day

Flask

2 weeks

Next.js

Same Lighthouse score. Flask's LCP is nearly 2× faster.

Both hit 100/100 Performance. Flask wins on LCP, TTI, TTFB, JS bundle, build time, and dependency count. See the full benchmark →

These aren't hypothetical numbers. This site is the proof.

Flask Vibe runs on Flask + PostgreSQL + Vanilla JS. No build step. No hydration. The metrics above are measured directly from this site in production.

0 KB

JS bundle

30ms

Server response (TTFB)

100

Lighthouse score

0s

Build time

Right-click anywhere on this page → View Source. You'll see real HTML — no React hydration markers, no minified bundles. Browse the source on GitHub →

Code Comparison

Common tasks, side by side

Task: "Hello World" Web Server

Flask (5 lines)
from flask import Flask
app = Flask(__name__)

@app.route('/')
def home():
    return "Hello World"

app.run()

Run: python app.py

Next.js (15+ files)
# Terminal commands
npx create-next-app myapp
cd myapp
npm install  # Wait 5 minutes...

# app/page.tsx
export default function Home() {
  return <div>Hello World</div>
}

# Run
npm run dev  # Wait 30s for build...

Setup: 5-10 minutes, 300MB installed

Task: Handle Form Submission (with validation & error feedback)

Flask (~18 lines) validation + error UI + DB
@app.route('/contact', methods=['POST'])
def contact():
    name = request.form.get('name', '').strip()
    email = request.form.get('email', '').strip()
    message = request.form.get('message', '').strip()

    # Validate
    if not name or not email or not message:
        flash('All fields are required', 'error')
        return redirect('/contact')
    if '@' not in email or '.' not in email:
        flash('Valid email required', 'error')
        return redirect('/contact')

    # Save to database (parameterised — no SQL injection)
    cur.execute("""
        INSERT INTO contacts (name, email, message)
        VALUES (%s, %s, %s)
    """, (name, email, message))
    conn.commit()
    return redirect('/thank-you')

Works without JavaScript. No build step. Error feedback via flash.

Next.js (60+ lines) API route + form component
// app/api/contact/route.ts
import { prisma } from '@/lib/prisma'
import { z } from 'zod'

const schema = z.object({
  name: z.string().min(1),
  email: z.string().email(),
  message: z.string().min(1)
})

export async function POST(req: Request) {
  const body = await req.json()
  const result = schema.safeParse(body)
  if (!result.success) {
    return Response.json({ error: 'Invalid' }, { status: 400 })
  }
  await prisma.contact.create({ data: result.data })
  return Response.json({ ok: true })
}

// components/ContactForm.tsx  ← required separate file
'use client'
import { useState } from 'react'

export function ContactForm() {
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false)
  const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null)

  async function handleSubmit(e: React.FormEvent) {
    e.preventDefault()
    setLoading(true); setError(null)
    const form = new FormData(e.currentTarget as HTMLFormElement)
    const res = await fetch('/api/contact', {
      method: 'POST',
      headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
      body: JSON.stringify(Object.fromEntries(form))
    })
    if (!res.ok) setError('Something went wrong')
    setLoading(false)
  }

  return (
    <form onSubmit={handleSubmit}>
      {error && <p className="text-red-500">{error}</p>}
      <input name="name" required />
      <input name="email" type="email" required />
      <textarea name="message" required />
      <button disabled={loading}>
        {loading ? 'Sending...' : 'Send'}
      </button>
    </form>
  )
}

Requires JavaScript. Two files minimum. Plus Prisma schema + TypeScript interfaces.

Fair comparison, same feature set: Flask delivers validation, parameterised SQL (no injection), and error feedback to the user in ~18 lines across one file. Next.js needs 60+ lines across two files minimum — and still requires JavaScript to be enabled. Flask's form works as a plain HTML POST even with JS disabled.

Task: Display Database Records

Flask (~12 lines) route + template, complete
# app.py
@app.route('/users')
def users():
    cur.execute("""
        SELECT id, name, email FROM users ORDER BY name
    """)
    users = cur.fetchall()
    return render_template('users.html', users=users)

# templates/users.html

Complete solution. The SQL you see is the SQL that runs.

Next.js (~20 lines) page only — schema not shown
// app/users/page.tsx
import { prisma } from '@/lib/prisma'

// Must stay in sync with DB schema by hand
interface User { id: number; name: string; email: string }

export default async function UsersPage() {
  const users: User[] = await prisma.user.findMany({
    select: { id: true, name: true, email: true },
    orderBy: { name: 'asc' }
  })
  return (
    <div>
      {users.map(user => (
        <div key={user.id}>
          <strong>{user.name}</strong> — {user.email}
        </div>
      ))}
    </div>
  )
}
// Not shown: prisma/schema.prisma + migration file

Prisma schema + migration not shown. TypeScript interface must be kept in sync manually.

The real test: add a phone field.

Flask — 2 edits, 2 files

  1. Add phone to the SQL SELECT
  2. Add {{ user.phone }} to the template

Next.js — 5+ edits, 4+ files

  1. Write a DB migration
  2. Update schema.prisma
  3. Run prisma generate
  4. Update the TypeScript interface
  5. Add phone: true to the query select
  6. Add {user.phone} to the JSX

Components pay off at scale — fair point. But every field change pays this tax, forever.

Use Case Matrix

Which framework wins for each use case?

Use Case
Flask
Next.js
CRUD Web App
Winner - Simple, fast HTML
Overkill for basic CRUD
Internal Dashboard
Winner - Fast, no JS needed
Adds complexity
SaaS MVP
Winner - Ship in days
Slower to iterate
Blog / Content Site
Winner - Static HTML, SEO
ISR works, but complex
E-commerce Site
Tie - Both work well
Tie - Good for checkout flow
Highly Interactive UI
Possible with vanilla JS
Winner - React excels here
Real-time Features
Needs Flask-SocketIO
Winner - Built for this
Mobile App Backend
Winner - Simple JSON API
API routes work, but heavy
Admin Panel
Winner - Or use Django
Need to build from scratch
AI-Assisted Dev
Winner - ~95% first-try rate*
~45% first-try rate*
Solo Developer
Winner - Less to manage
Overwhelming alone
Large Team
Tie - Clear structure
Tie - Component isolation
Prototyping
Winner - 30 second setup
5 min setup + build time
SEO-Critical Site
Winner - Pure HTML
SSR works, adds complexity
Marketing Site
Winner - Fast, simple
Overkill for static content

* AI first-try success rates are based on real project experience, not a controlled study. Reasonable estimates — the underlying cause (Flask code is readable; Prisma output must be run to verify) is structural. Full explanation →

10

Flask Wins

2

Next.js Wins

3

Tie / Context-Dependent

The Honest Verdict

Choose Flask When:

  • You're building a standard web app (most projects)
  • You want to ship fast and iterate quickly
  • You value simplicity and transparency
  • You're using AI assistants for development
  • Performance and page speed matter
  • You want full control over your database queries
  • You're a solo developer or small team

Choose Next.js When:

  • You're building a highly interactive, SPA-like UI
  • You need complex client-side state management
  • Your team is already expert in React ecosystem
  • You're building real-time collaborative features
  • You want to deploy to Vercel with one click
  • You need ISR (Incremental Static Regeneration)

Bottom Line

"For 80% of web apps, Flask is faster to build, faster to load, and easier to maintain. Next.js is incredible for the 20% that need rich interactivity. Don't use a framework because it's trendy. Use it because it solves your problem."

— Frederick Tubiermont

Ready to Try Flask?

Experience the simplicity and performance of Flask for yourself.