Flask vs
Next.js
An honest, data-driven comparison for 2026
This isn't about bashing Next.js. It's about choosing the right tool.
Next.js is incredible for certain use cases. But for most web applications—CRUD apps, dashboards, internal tools, MVPs—Flask is faster, simpler, and more transparent.
Below is a comprehensive comparison based on real projects, not marketing claims.
Project Structure
Same app, different complexity
The Difference
Flask: 15 files you understand completely. Next.js: 50+ files you wrote, plus 30,000 files in node_modules you've never seen. Which one can you debug at 2am?
Performance Metrics
Measured from dedicated benchmark applications — same SaaS dashboard, both stacks
Largest Contentful Paint
Flask
Next.js
JS Bundle
Flask
Next.js (split)
Time to Interactive
Flask (no hydration)
Next.js (hydration cost)
Lighthouse Score
Flask
Next.js — tie
Build Time
Flask (no build)
Next.js
Install Time
Flask (pip)
Next.js (npm)
Disk Space
Flask
Next.js (node_modules)
Learning Curve
Flask
Next.js
Same Lighthouse score. Flask's LCP is nearly 2× faster.
Both hit 100/100 Performance. Flask wins on LCP, TTI, TTFB, JS bundle, build time, and dependency count. See the full benchmark →
These aren't hypothetical numbers. This site is the proof.
Flask Vibe runs on Flask + PostgreSQL + Vanilla JS. No build step. No hydration. The metrics above are measured directly from this site in production.
JS bundle
Server response (TTFB)
Lighthouse score
Build time
Right-click anywhere on this page → View Source. You'll see real HTML — no React hydration markers, no minified bundles. Browse the source on GitHub →
Code Comparison
Common tasks, side by side
Task: "Hello World" Web Server
from flask import Flask
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route('/')
def home():
return "Hello World"
app.run()
Run: python app.py
# Terminal commands
npx create-next-app myapp
cd myapp
npm install # Wait 5 minutes...
# app/page.tsx
export default function Home() {
return <div>Hello World</div>
}
# Run
npm run dev # Wait 30s for build...
Setup: 5-10 minutes, 300MB installed
Task: Handle Form Submission (with validation & error feedback)
@app.route('/contact', methods=['POST'])
def contact():
name = request.form.get('name', '').strip()
email = request.form.get('email', '').strip()
message = request.form.get('message', '').strip()
# Validate
if not name or not email or not message:
flash('All fields are required', 'error')
return redirect('/contact')
if '@' not in email or '.' not in email:
flash('Valid email required', 'error')
return redirect('/contact')
# Save to database (parameterised — no SQL injection)
cur.execute("""
INSERT INTO contacts (name, email, message)
VALUES (%s, %s, %s)
""", (name, email, message))
conn.commit()
return redirect('/thank-you')
Works without JavaScript. No build step. Error feedback via flash.
// app/api/contact/route.ts
import { prisma } from '@/lib/prisma'
import { z } from 'zod'
const schema = z.object({
name: z.string().min(1),
email: z.string().email(),
message: z.string().min(1)
})
export async function POST(req: Request) {
const body = await req.json()
const result = schema.safeParse(body)
if (!result.success) {
return Response.json({ error: 'Invalid' }, { status: 400 })
}
await prisma.contact.create({ data: result.data })
return Response.json({ ok: true })
}
// components/ContactForm.tsx ← required separate file
'use client'
import { useState } from 'react'
export function ContactForm() {
const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false)
const [error, setError] = useState<string | null>(null)
async function handleSubmit(e: React.FormEvent) {
e.preventDefault()
setLoading(true); setError(null)
const form = new FormData(e.currentTarget as HTMLFormElement)
const res = await fetch('/api/contact', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
body: JSON.stringify(Object.fromEntries(form))
})
if (!res.ok) setError('Something went wrong')
setLoading(false)
}
return (
<form onSubmit={handleSubmit}>
{error && <p className="text-red-500">{error}</p>}
<input name="name" required />
<input name="email" type="email" required />
<textarea name="message" required />
<button disabled={loading}>
{loading ? 'Sending...' : 'Send'}
</button>
</form>
)
}
Requires JavaScript. Two files minimum. Plus Prisma schema + TypeScript interfaces.
Fair comparison, same feature set: Flask delivers validation, parameterised SQL (no injection), and error feedback to the user in ~18 lines across one file. Next.js needs 60+ lines across two files minimum — and still requires JavaScript to be enabled. Flask's form works as a plain HTML POST even with JS disabled.
Task: Display Database Records
# app.py
@app.route('/users')
def users():
cur.execute("""
SELECT id, name, email FROM users ORDER BY name
""")
users = cur.fetchall()
return render_template('users.html', users=users)
# templates/users.html
Complete solution. The SQL you see is the SQL that runs.
// app/users/page.tsx
import { prisma } from '@/lib/prisma'
// Must stay in sync with DB schema by hand
interface User { id: number; name: string; email: string }
export default async function UsersPage() {
const users: User[] = await prisma.user.findMany({
select: { id: true, name: true, email: true },
orderBy: { name: 'asc' }
})
return (
<div>
{users.map(user => (
<div key={user.id}>
<strong>{user.name}</strong> — {user.email}
</div>
))}
</div>
)
}
// Not shown: prisma/schema.prisma + migration file
Prisma schema + migration not shown. TypeScript interface must be kept in sync manually.
The real test: add a phone field.
Flask — 2 edits, 2 files
- Add
phoneto the SQLSELECT - Add
{{ user.phone }}to the template
Next.js — 5+ edits, 4+ files
- Write a DB migration
- Update
schema.prisma - Run
prisma generate - Update the TypeScript
interface - Add
phone: trueto the queryselect - Add
{user.phone}to the JSX
Components pay off at scale — fair point. But every field change pays this tax, forever.
Use Case Matrix
Which framework wins for each use case?
* AI first-try success rates are based on real project experience, not a controlled study. Reasonable estimates — the underlying cause (Flask code is readable; Prisma output must be run to verify) is structural. Full explanation →
Flask Wins
Next.js Wins
Tie / Context-Dependent
The Honest Verdict
Choose Flask When:
- You're building a standard web app (most projects)
- You want to ship fast and iterate quickly
- You value simplicity and transparency
- You're using AI assistants for development
- Performance and page speed matter
- You want full control over your database queries
- You're a solo developer or small team
Choose Next.js When:
- You're building a highly interactive, SPA-like UI
- You need complex client-side state management
- Your team is already expert in React ecosystem
- You're building real-time collaborative features
- You want to deploy to Vercel with one click
- You need ISR (Incremental Static Regeneration)
Bottom Line
"For 80% of web apps, Flask is faster to build, faster to load, and easier to maintain. Next.js is incredible for the 20% that need rich interactivity. Don't use a framework because it's trendy. Use it because it solves your problem."
— Frederick Tubiermont
Ready to Try Flask?
Experience the simplicity and performance of Flask for yourself.